Anil Tandon v. Hdfc Bank Ltd.

$~64 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 6647/2024, CRL.M.A. 25487/2024 (stay) ANIL TANDON .....Petitioner Through:

Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given) versus HDFC BANK LTD.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Kunal Tandon, Mr. Rishi Gupta and Mr. Honnie S. Brara, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 27.08.2024 CRL.M.A. 25388/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6647/2024 (under Section 482 CrPC filed by the petitioner to quash the summoning order dated 21.12.2017) 3.

The Petition under Section 482 CrPC has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of the summoning Order dated 21.12.2017, passed in CC No. 13147/2017 for the offence under Section 138/41 of N.I. Act, pending adjudication before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-2 (NI-Act), (Central), Tis Hazari Courts. The ground on which the Petition has been filed is that the earlier counsel, who has now expired, had given wrong legal advise.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:32:28

4.

It is a Petition challenging the summoning Order dated 21.12.2017 i.e. after about 61⁄2 years. The Order was amenable to revisional Jurisdiction of the learned ASJ. Moreover, there is an inordinate delay. The Petition is, therefore, dismissed and disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 27, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:32:28