Emerald Industries v. Tata Aldesa Jv

$~56 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 646/2024 EMERALD INDUSTRIES .....Petitioner Through:

Ms. Ankita Sharma, Mr. Harilal S., and Mr. Aslam Ahmed, Advocates versus TATA ALDESA JV .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Naveen Chawla and Mr.

Mayank Bughani, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL) % 27.08.2024 1.

This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 for extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal presently in seisin of the disputes between the parties. 2.

It is stated that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is expiring on 8 September 2024.

3.

Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection to extension of the mandate, as sought.

4.

Accordingly, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal stands extended by nine months with effect from 8 September 2024. 1 "the 1996 Act" hereinafter OMP(MISC)(COMM) 646/2024 KUMAR 14:06:24 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 14:04:40

5.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

AUGUST 27, 2024/yg Click here to check corrigendum, if any OMP(MISC)(COMM) 646/2024 KUMAR 14:06:24 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 14:04:40