Ahuja International v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$-10 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1521/2017 AHUJA INTERNATIONAL Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv.

+ W.P.(C) 1560/2017 H.M.INTERNATIONAL Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI

ORDER

% 22.03.2017 It is stated that the refund claims have been approved but without interest. In such cases, the Revenue shall indicate by separate reasons why interest has not been granted and pass a speaking order to be issued to the assessee/petitioner within two weeks. The DVAT Department shall ensure that the amounts shall be credited to the petitioners' accounts, within a week.

By:AMULYA

h In case of any dispute or discrepancy, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the VATO, who shall make his reasoned order dealing with such objection, within 30 days of receipt of such application.

The writ petitions and the pending applications are disposed off.

A copy of this order be given dasti to parties under the signatures of the Court Master.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MARCH 22,2017 NAJMI WAZIRI, J