Kiran Taneja v. Commissioner Of Police & ORS.

I.

2-F Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 429/2013, Cr1. M.As. 7946/2013, 19473/2013, 19474/2014, 1164/2014 and 13639/2015 RENU JOSHI & ANBR Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa and Mr. R.K. Singh, Advs.

versus STATE & ORS Respondent Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with SI Vijender Inspector Parveen Kr., Anti Corruption Branch Mr. Rishi Nehgal, Adv. for the complainant.

P Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankush Narang, Adv. for applicant in Cr1. M.A.

1623 8/20 13 + W.P.(CRL) 648/2014, Cr1. M.A. 5106/2014 KIRAN TANEJA Petitioner Through: Mr. N.M. Popli and Mr. V.M. Popli, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.

.....Respondent Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Adv. Standing Counsel for R-3/South Delhi Municipal Corporation.

Inspector Parveen Kr., Anti Corruption Branch.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

ORDER

% 16.11.2017 This petition seeks quashing of FIR No. 1/2013 dated 24.01.2013 registered under Section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act & Sections 420/467/468/120B IPC at Police Station

Anti-Corruption Branch, Delhi.

A status report has been filed by the Inspector, Anti Corruption Branch stating that due to lack of evidence to corroborate/substantiate the allegations of forging and cheating, a closure report has been filed in the aforesaid case and the matter has been kept for consideration before the Court of Special Judge, Anti-Corruption Branch, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi on 25.11.2017.

In the circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that nothing remains in the matter and he would like to withdraw the matter as the petition has become infructuous, with liberty to approach the Court concerned should there be any grievance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.

NAJI WAZIRI, J NOVEMBER 16, 2017/acm