M/S Capital First Ltd v. Satish Chopra & ORS

$~18&19 *

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 130/2014 & EX.APPL.(OS) Nos. 277/2014 & 627/2015 M/S CAPITAL FIRST LTD Through:

Decree Holder Mr Satish Kumar, Advocate.

versus SATISH CHOPRA & ORS Through:

Judgement Debtors Mr Sanjeet Singh, Advocate for Judgment Debtor-L Mr Rakesh Makhija and Ms Priyanka Sharma, Advocates for Judgment Debtor-2.

IN AND ^ EX.P.140/2014& EX.APPL.(OS)Nos. 305-306/2014,770/2014& 626/2015 MVS CAPITAL FIRST LTD Decree Holder Through:

Mr Satish Kumar, Advocate.

versus SATISH CHOPRA & ORS Through:

..... Judgement Debtors Mr Sanjeet Singh, Advocate for Judgment Debtor-1.

Mr Rakesh Makhija and Ms Priyanka Sharma, Advocates for Judgment Debtor-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

ORDER

V % 16.11.2016 The learned counsel for the Decree Holder states that Judgment Debtors have regularised the accounts and, therefore, he has instructions to withdraw, these petitions with liberty to file afresh in the event the Judgement Debtors default in their obligations. By:AMULYA

The learned counsel for the Judgment Debtors states that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, a fresh execution petition will not be maintainable. This aspect would be considered as and when the Decree Holder files a fresh petition to enforce the award. The petitions and all the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

/ • VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 16,2016 RK v;