Parvati v. State & ORS.

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 389/2014 & CRL.M.A.No.5117/14 PARVATI ..... Appellant Through :

Ms.Divya Chugh, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate.

Appellant along with her husband.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with Insp.Ajay Kumar, PS Jahangirpuri.

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for R2 & R3 along with R2 & R3 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 07.11.2016 1.

Pursuant to the order dated 25.10.2016, additional compensation of `35,000/- has been given to the appellant present in the Court today along with her husband.

2.

It is agreed that the respondents shall not contact the appellant / complainant or any of her family members and shall not criminally intimidate them in any manner.

3.

In view of the settlement and the receipt of payment of `35,000/- as additional compensation, the appellant does not press the present appeal for enhancement of the sentence.

4.

The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

5.

The respondents No.2 & 3 shall not contact the appellant and her family members and shall not endeavour to criminally intimidate them in any manner.

NOVEMBER 07, 2016 / tr S.P.GARG, J

Crl.A.389/2014 Statement of appellant - Parvati, W/o Laxman Singh, R/o Juggi No.446, K-Block Lakhi Park, Jahangirpuri, Delhi. On S.A.

Pursuant to the order dated 25.10.2016, I have received `35,000/- as additional compensation from respondents No.2 & 3. In view of this, I do not press my appeal for enhancement of sentence. R.O. & A.C.

07.11.2016 S.P.GARG (JUDGE)