Parveen Kuamr Sharma And Others v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR

$~70 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 6893/2024 PARVEEN KUAMR SHARMA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Pushpeet Arora and Mr. Sagar Sharma, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Sunil Butt and SI Paramjeet Singh Mr. Sumeet Singh Shokeen and Ms.

Pranya Kulkarni, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 02.09.2024 CRL.M.A. 26372/2024 (exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2.

Application accordingly disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6893/2024 3.

The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.') has been filed on behalf of the petitioners and Respondent No.2 seeking quashing of FIR bearing No. 0381/2019 registered at Police Station Ranhoula for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'). 4.

Issue notice. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5.

A request for quashing of the FIR has been made on account of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Settlement inter se the parties. It is stated that no child was born out of the said wedlock. Since 2018 the parties started residing separately. It is stated that on 31.05.2024 both the parties amicably settled all the disputes and differences before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi and it was interalia settled between the parties that petitioner no. 1 shall pay a sum of Rs. 3,70,000/- to the respondent no. 2 as full and final amount. It is also stated that the petitioner no. 1 has already paid Rs. 2,40,000/- to respondent no. 2 and has handed over a Demand Draft bearing No. 147308 of Rs. 1,30,000/- to the Respondent No. 2 in the Court today. Pursuant to the Settlement, the parties have taken a Divorce by mutual consent on 15.07.2024. In view of the settlement, the present petition has been filed. All the parties endorse the Settlement and state that they shall remain bound by it.

6.

The parties are present before this Court today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. 7.

Today, the complainant who is present in Court states that she has received all amounts due to her and has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 8.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 0381/2019 registered at Police Station Ranhoula for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/506/34 of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10.

The petition stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/PT The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.