Surender Kumar v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi, & ORS.
$~47 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 12187/2025 & CM APPL. 49680/2025 SURENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Anil Hooda and Mr. Satendra Singh Baghel, Advs. (Through VC) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Meherunissa A. Jaitley and Mr.
Dev Pratap Shahi, Advs. for R-1 and Mob: 9717100486 Email:
meherunissa.anand@gmail.com Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Yash Narain, Advocates for R-3 & 4 Mob: 8802991089 Email: rajesh.laws@gmail.com Mr. Varun Gupta, Adv. for R-5 (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 14.10.2025 1.
The present writ petition has been filed praying for directions to respondent nos. 1 to 4, to take action against the respondent no. 5, and his tenant, for running a factory in the residential area, and playing loud music after 10.00 P.M. from the premises, i.e., Building No. 6068, Gali Satnarayan The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Mandir, Nabi Karim, New Delhi-110055.
2.
Status Report dated 12th September, 2025 has been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD"), wherein, it is stated as follows:
"xxx xxx xxx The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
3.
Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report shows that requisite action has already been taken and that the said premises have already been vacated by the tenant of respondent no. 5.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 5 confirms the fact that the premises of respondent no. 5 already stands vacated by his tenant. 5.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that his grievance, accordingly, stands satisfied and he does not wish to press the present writ petition any further.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
6.
Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J OCTOBER 14, 2025/SK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.