← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./5598/2025

Anubhav Tiwari v. State NCT Of Delhi And ANR

2025-08-14Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna3 pages

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5598/2025 ANUBHAV TIWARI .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mishra and Ms. Soni Kumar, Advocates with Petitioner in person.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP with SI Rohtash Meena, Traffic and SI Inderjeet Yadav, PS: Janakpuri with Respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 14.08.2025 CRL.M.A. 24022/2025 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 5598/2025 3.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS') has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0063/2023 under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 3/181 of Motor Vehicle Act, registered at PS: Janak Puri, New Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

4.

Issue Notice.

5.

Learned APP for the State appearing on advance Notice, accepts Notice.

6.

Respondent No.2 in person/injured is present in person and submits The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

that she has received Rs.1,80,000/- from the Petitioner towards full and final settlement of all her claims including that of MACT. 7.

It is submitted that on 17.02.2023, on the complaint of Respondent No.2, FIR No.0063/2023 under Sections 279/338 IPC was registered at PS: Janak Puri, New Delhi and Sections 3/181 of Motor Vehicle Act were added in the Chargesheet.

8.

The parties are present before this Court in-person today and have been identified by their learned Counsel and concerned Investigating Officer.

9.

In view of No Object Affidavit of Respondent No.2 dated 26.07.2025, the present Petition has been filed.

10.

The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR. The present Petition has been signed by the Petitioners and is supported by their Affidavits. The parties submit that the matter has been settled without any pressure and coercion.

11.

Respondent No. 2 states that she has received all amounts of claim and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 12.

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

13.

Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the aforesaid FIR in question.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

14.

Consequently, FIR No.0063/2023 under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 3/181 of Motor Vehicle Act, registered at PS: Janak Puri, New Delhi and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 15.

The Petition alongwith pending Application, is disposed of accordingly.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 14, 2025/R The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.