Dr.Ravi Singh v. Dap Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

$~65 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1444/2013 DR.RAVI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.A.K. Vashishtha, Adv.

versus DAP BUILDCON PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent Through Mr.Shravan Sahny, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 03.08.2016 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 26.03.2013 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and the order dated 10.04.2013 passed by the Revisional Court.

The facts in brief are that the respondent/complainant had filed a complaint against the petitioner/accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonouring of two cheques bearing no.000032 and 000033 both dated 07.11.2012 which were dishonoured on account of insufficiency of funds. On putting appearance by the petitioner before the Trial Court, notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. was framed and the petitioner pleaded guilty.

On the basis of pleading guilty of the offence, the Trial Court passed the order of conviction dated 26.03.2013. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a revision petition which was

dismissed vide order dated 10.04.2013.

It is apparent from the record that the order was passed by the Trial Court on the basis of pleading guilty by the petitioner and that the same was passed in the year 2013, this Court is of the considered opinion that under Section 482 Cr.P.C. no relief can be granted to the petitioner.

The petition and application, if any, are dismissed. Interim stay granted vide order dated 15.04.2013 stands vacated.

P.S.TEJI, J AUGUST 03, 2016 dd