Sharda Devi v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR.

$~4 W.P.(C) 1466/2017 SHARDA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Shailani, Advocate.

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.

..... Respondent Through: Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for R-1.

Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Gaurav Singhal, Advocate.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus against the respondent not to disturb the position of the petitioner and not to dispossess the petitioner from the site i.e. near B-58, Public Toilet, B-Block, Main Road, Budh Nagar, Inderpuri, New Delhi. Learned counsel for respondent has filed a short counter affidavit and a photograph has been annexed to show where the petitioner claims to be squatting i.e. outside a public toilet. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some hearing, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to Town Vending Committee, as and when constituted, to would also consider her case. He, however, prays that merely because she is not found squatting at the site in question, her case

may not be rejected. Ms. Kalra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, without admitting any of the averments made in the petition, submits that as and when Town Vending Committee is constituted the case of the petitioner would be considered in case the application is made along with supporting documents. Merely because the petitioner is not found squatting would not be a ground alone to reject her case.

In view of the stands taken by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

$~11 to 16 & 20 to 22 W.P.(C) 927/2017 W.P.(C) 943/2017 W.P.(C) 944/2017 W.P.(C) 945/2017 W.P.(C) 961/2017 W.P.(C) 963/2017 W.P.(C) 2301/2017 W.P.(C) 2304/2017 W.P.(C) 2305/2017 RAM BHARAT ..... Petitioner ANIL KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner PANCHAM CHAURASIA ..... Petitioner KUNDAN LAL ..... Petitioner RATAN KUMAR CHAURASIA ..... Petitioner SHYAM LAL ..... Petitioner ANOKHE LAL .....Petitioner CHAND MOHAMMAD .....Petitioner KHERI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Rajnish Kumar Singh, Advocate.

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.

..... Respondent Through: Ms. Namrata Mukim, Advocate for North MCD with Mr. Deepesh, LI, KBZ in W.P.(C) 943/2017 and Mr. Bharat, RC, KBZ in W.P.(C) 944/2017.

Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate for North DMC in W.P.(C) 927/2017 & W.P.(C) 961/2017 Mr. Bharat Bhushan, RC, KBZ.

Mr. Raghav Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for GNCTD in W.P.(C) 927/2017, W.P.(C) 943/2017 &

W.P.(C) 944/2017.

Mr. Sumit Agarwal, Advocate for R-2 in W.P.(C) 945/2017, W.P.(C) 961/2017 & W.P.(C) 963/2017.

Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate with Mr. Navneet Tripathi, Advocate for North MCD in W.P.(C) 945/2017 & W.P.(C) 963/2017.

Mr. Jitender Tripathi, Advocate for R-1 in W.P.(C) 2304/2017.

As prayed, list on 19.05.2017.

G.S.SISTANI, J VINOD GOEL, J

$~23 CRL.A. 762/2013 DEVENDER @ MONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.Jitender Sethi, Advocate.

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Uday Singh.

Crl. M.B. No. 603/2017 (suspension of sentence) Adjournment is sought on behalf of counsel for the appellant. List on 18.05.2017. Latest nominal roll be sent to court. Counsel to prepare a short synopsis.

$~57 W.P.(C) 2556/2015 VYAPARI KALYAN MANDAL MAIN PUSHPA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pranav Proothi, Advocate with Mr.Prerna Arora, Advocate.

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.

Shipra Garg, Advocate for Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for SDMC.

Mr. Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for GNCTD.

Mr. Narayan Krishan & Mr. Rasna Kalkat, Advocate for R-8/NASVI.

As prayed, list on 01.05.2017.

$~7 CRL.A. 167/2016 MOHSIN @ VICKY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.S. Juneja, Advocate with Ms.Amandeep Kaur and Mr.Yogesh Kumar Rana, Advocates.

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Niranjan Kumar, PS Bhajan Pura, Delhi. List on 27.04.2017.

$~24 CRL.A. 423/2016 ANIL @ HUNNY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate.

STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. Crl.M.(B) 353/2017 This is an application seeking suspension of sentence. After some hearing, the application is not pressed. The same is dismissed as not pressed.

CRL.A. 423/2016 Counsel for the appellant submits that no case under Section 302 IPC is made out. At best the appellant could have been convicted under Section 304 IPC as there is no premeditation, the appellant's conduct was not cruel and there was only one injury. Additionally, he submits that the appellant was 21 years old at the time of incident. Both the parties wish to produce the law. List on 28.04.2017.

$~28 to 35 W.P.(C) 159/2017 W.P.(C) 166/2017 W.P.(C) 168/2017 W.P.(C) 171/2017 W.P.(C) 174/2017 W.P.(C) 176/2017 W.P.(C) 179/2017 W.P.(C) 186/2017 RAJENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner BALESHWAR ..... Petitioner VIPIN KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner SUKHDEV ..... Petitioner MOHD. ISMAIL ..... Petitioner MOHD. NAEEM KHAN ..... Petitioner MAHESH CHAND ..... Petitioner RAGHUBIR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Wamika Trehan, Advocate with Mr.Ali R. Osmani, Advocate.

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for NDMC.

C.M. 9657/2017 (delay in filing reply) in W.P (C) 159/2017

C.M. 11111/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 166/2017 C.M. 11112/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 168/2017 C.M. 11115/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 171/2017 C.M. 11110/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 174/2017 C.M. 11113/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 176/2017 C.M. 11114/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 179/2017 C.M. 11109/2017 (delay in filing rejoinder) in W.P (C) 186/2017 For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. The delay is condoned.

The applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) 159/2017, W.P.(C) 166/2017, W.P.(C) 168/2017, W.P.(C) 171/2017, W.P.(C) 174/2017, W.P.(C) 176/2017, W.P.(C) 179/2017, & W.P.(C) 186/2017.

At the request of counsel for the petitioner, adjourned to 01.05.2017.

$~36 to 38 CRL.A. 1151/2016 & Crl.M. (B) 2135/2016 VIKAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate with Mr.Narsingh Narain Rai, Advocate.

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri, Delhi.

CRL.A. 104/2017 NEERAJ @ KARAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate.

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri, Delhi.

CRL.A. 82/2017 & Crl.M. (B) 126/2017 SONU @ MATKA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate.

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri, Delhi.

All the three appellants are present in court pursuant to the order dated 28.02.2017. Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the purpose of production of the appellants was to give an opportunity to the counsel to interact with them.

As prayed, list in due course.

$~41 W.P.(C) 12169/2016 RAJ KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Advocate.

NEW DELHI MUNICPAL COUNCIL AND ORS..... Respondents. Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for NDMC.

Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil) for GNCTD.

At request of counsel for the petitioner, list on 17.05.2017.

$~42 & 43 CRL.L.P. 477/2016 SADHNA GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vibhor Garg, Advocate with Ms.Ishita Bisht, Advocate.

STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Dalip Kumar, Special Cell.

Mr. S. Gaurav Sasan, Advocate for Afroz @ Feroz @ Pehalwan.

CRL.L.P. 650/2016 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Dalip Kumar, Special Cell.

AFROZ @ FEROZ @ PEHLWAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. Gaurav Sasan, Advocate.

Again adjournment is sought on the ground that counsel for Afroz is not available. Counsel was not present even on the last date of hearing. List on 18.05.2017.

$~42 & 43 CRL.L.P. 477/2016 SADHNA GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vibhor Garg, Advocate with Ms.Ishita Bisht, Advocate.

STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Dalip Kumar, Special Cell.

Mr. S. Gaurav Sasan, Advocate for Afroz @ Feroz @ Pehalwan.

CRL.L.P. 650/2016 STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Dalip Kumar, Special Cell.

AFROZ @ FEROZ @ PEHLWAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S. Gaurav Sasan, Advocate.

Again adjournment is sought on the ground that counsel for Afroz is not available. Counsel was not present even on the last date of hearing. List on 18.05.2017.

$~48 W.P.(C) 3591/2017 NATIONAL HAWKERS FEDERATION ( AKSHARDHAM) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocate with Mr.K.M. Thakur, Advocate.

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD for R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4.

Mr. Mridul Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Advocate for R-5.

Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate with Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AR for R7/DMRC. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Tanuj Chopra, Advocate for R-8.

C.M. 15789/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3591/2017 & CM No. 15788/2017 (stay) Counsel for the EDMC is not available today. List on 01.05.2017.

$~9 CRL.L.P. 366/2016 MAYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person.

STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with Insp. Satish Chandra, PS Badarpur with SI Rajeev Kumar, PS Jait Pur, Delhi.

Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate for R-2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment to enable him to address arguments in the matter. List on 11.05.2017. Trial court record shall be sent to court.

$~26 W.P.(C) 1321/2016 SATISH CHANDER GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Nandan, Advocate.

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for SDMC.

Mr. Satyakam, Advocate for GNCTD.

Counter affidavit filed. Time is sought to file rejoinder. Let the rejoinder be filed within three weeks. List on 25.05.2017.

$~27 W.P.(C) 11646/2016 EKTA SANSKAAR LAXMI NAGAR RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) AND ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate.

EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate for R-1, R-2 and R-5/EDMC.

Ms.Roma Bhagat, Advocate for R-4.

Counsel for the respondent no. 4 seeks further time to comply with the order dated 28.02.2017. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the position at the site remain unchanged. List on 23.05.2017.