← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/97/2024

Wall Rock Infratech Private Limited v. Union Of India & ORS.

2024-12-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela,Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice2 pages

$~15 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 97/2024 CM APPL. 421/2024 WALL ROCK INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr Deepak Kapoor, Mr Saurabh Soni, Ms Mannat Singh, Mr Sanjeet Kumar Thakur, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr Vipul Aggarwal, SSC, Mr Girban Naushad and Ms Sakshi Shairwal, JSCs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 17.12.2024 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the notice dated 23.02.2023 (hereafter the impugned notice) issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) as well as the approval granted under Section 151 of the Act. 2.

It is relevant to note that the impugned notice has been issued in respect of the assessment year (AY) 2013-14. According to the petitioner, the said notice is beyond the period of the limitation. 3.

Undisputedly, this issue is covered in favour of the petitioner by the earlier decision of the Coordinate Bench of this court in Dinesh Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 20, Delhi & The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:58

the case of The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central-1 v. Ojjus Housing Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4.

In terms of the aforesaid decisions, the period of ten years is required to be reckoned from the end of the assessment year, which is relevant to the previous year in which the notice under Section 148 of the Act has been issued.

5.

The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue concurs with the aforesaid proposition.

6.

In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. The impugned notice is set aside as being barred by limitation. 7.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application also stands disposed of.

VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J DECEMBER 17, 2024 M Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2024 at 12:15:58