Manoj Kumar v. State & ANR.

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 662/2016 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Sanjay Saxena, Advocate.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondent Through :

Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 29.02.2016 CRL.M.A. 3642/2016 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 662/2016 Wife of the petitioner was missing since 13.02.2016 which led to the filing of the present petition. We are informed that the wife of the petitioner has since returned to her husband on 26.02.2016, counsel for the petitioner submits that she is present in court with the petitioner. Deepti says that she would like to stay with her husband and not with her parents. Counsel for the petitioner submits that only direction which petitioner and Deepti are seeking at this stage is that the concerned police station should ensure their safety. Deepti claims to be a major and supporting documents have been placed on record.

Mr. Mehra submits that one mobile number of Beat Constable would be provided to the couple and the safety of the couple shall be ensured.

With these directions, the writ petiton is disposed of. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J FEBRUARY 29, 2016 sc