Talib v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3114/2025 TALIB .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Rashid Hashmi, Advocate.
versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Omkant Yadav, PS Hauz Qazi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 17.12.2025 1.
First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'B.N.S.S.'), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Talib for grant of Regular Bail in FIR No. 83/2025 under Section 109(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police Station Hauz Khasi.
2.
It is submitted that the FIR has been registered the Petitioner, as well as, the other accused persons, namely, Huzaifa Rajput and Mohd. Usama @ Osama. As per the FIR, the other co-accused had inflicted injuries with the knife while the Petitioner gave legs and fist blows. The Charge-Sheet has already been filed in the Court. The injury sustained by the injured was simple in nature. The Cross-FIR No. 84/2025 dated 31.01.2025 was recorded on the same day. The Bail Application filed before the learned ASJ, has been dismissed on 22.03.2025, 22.05.2025 and 10.07.2025. The Petitioner has clean antecedents. He is in judicial custody for more than six The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
months. Hence, a prayer is, therefore, made that the Petitioner be granted Bail.
3.
Status Report has already been filed on behalf of the State wherein the entire details of the FIR and the Charge-Sheet, has been narrated. 4.
The Bail is opposed on the ground that the nature of offence is serious as injuries were caused to the Complainant and his brother. The Role of the Applicant has been clearly explained by the two victims. The Prosecution evidence is yet to commence and there is likelihood of the public witnesses being influenced by the Applicant. He may jump the Bail and flee from justice. The Bail is, therefore, opposed.
5.
Submissions heard and the record perused.
The allegations against the Applicant, are of giving fist and leg blows. Considering the role and nature of allegations against the Applicant and that the Charge-Sheet in the aforesaid FIRs, have already been filed, the Accused /Petitioner is granted Regular Bail, on the following terms and conditions: a) The Petitioner/Accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.35,000/- and one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.
b) The Petitioner/Accused shall appear before the Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing;
c) The Petitioner/Accused shall provide his mobile number/changed mobile number to the IO concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times;
d) The Petitioner/Accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate or intimidate the witnesses. e) In case the Petitioner/Accused changes his residential address, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
the same shall be intimated to learned Trial Court and to the concerned I.O.
6.
The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly. 7.
The copy of this Order be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent, as well as, to the learned Trial Court. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J DECEMBER 17, 2025/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.