Sh. Sanjeev Grover & ORS. v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6999/2024 and CRL.M.A. 26716/2024 SH. SANJEEV GROVER & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajeev Saini, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Sandeep Respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 05.09.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.170/2017 registered under Sections 354/354B/323/506/509/34 IPC at P.S. Punjabi Bagh, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, petitioners misbehaved with respondent No.2 and destroyed her belongings. 3.

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that the parties are related to each other inasmuch as the complainant is the sister-in-law of petitioner No.1 and that the chargesheet has been filed.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:34:40

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into a settlement vide MOU/Undertaking dated 03.06.2024 and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim or grievance whatsoever against the petitioners. 5.

The petitioners, who are present in the Court, have been identified by their counsel as well as by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2, who is present in the Court, has been identified by the Investigating Officer. 6.

The petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and they undertake not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid MOU/Undertaking out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed. 7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is another connected FIR which has been listed before another Court. 8.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

9.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

DASTI.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 na The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/09/2024 at 12:34:40