Sanjay Kumar And ORS v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12425/2024 SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Ms. Surbhi Bagra, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Ms.

Bhavi Garg and Mr. Naveen, Advocates for R-1.

Mr. Girindra Kumar Pathak, Advocate for R-2.

Mr. Tejasvi Goel, Advocate for R-3 with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Accounts department.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 22.07.2025 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks following prayers:- "a. Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.1 to issue a corrigendum order on the remaining issues pertaining to the demand to regularise the services of the workman aforesaid on their respective post in proper payscale from the initial date of their respective joining and to also pay them difference of wages on the "Principle of Equal Pay for Equal Work interalia" and thereafter refer the same to the Ld. Central Government Industrial Tribunalcum Labour Court for adjudication in ID No. 66/2020 titled Sanjay & Ors. Vs University of Delhi with immediate effect;

b. Pass any such other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/07/2025 at 12:25:19

Petitioners."

3.

The grievance of the petitioner was that the reference order was not in accordance with the prayer as sought before the learned Conciliation Officer. 4.

During the pendency of the present petition, the necessary corrigendum dated 24.10.2024 has been issued by Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment. The said corrigendum alongwith the forwarding letter dated 12.11.2024 issued by Regional Labour Commissioner (C)/HOO, New Delhi has been handed up in Court today and the same are taken on record. 5.

In view of the above, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not press the present petition. 6.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 7.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J JULY 22, 2025/sn/yg The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/07/2025 at 12:25:19