Sanjay Arora v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 300/2017 SANJAY ARORA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shivam Chaudhary with Mr. Shashank Chaudhary & Mr. Aditya Deshwal, Advocates.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Vijay, PS Vijay Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 28.08.2017 The regular bail application of the petitioner is pending consideration. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press his application for regular bail. However, he has filed the list of witnesses examined before the Trial Court giving the choronology of the dates of when they were examined and he presses that the Trial Court may be asked to expedite the trial.

In all 24 witnesses have been examined, cross examination of nine witnesses have been deferred for want of case property and few documents not being traceable.

The Trial Court to make every effort to ensure the production of the case property and the documents in Court for want of which the cross examination of PW-20, PW-21 and PW-24 had to deferred so that the trial of the case is not further delayed.

With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Copy of order be sent to the learned Trial Court. SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J AUGUST 28, 2017/afa