Amrik Singh v. State
$-24,25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.REV.P.68/2012&Crl.M.A.No.1754/2012 PREETIKALRA&QRS.
p \ , Petitioners Through:
None.
versus STATE , Respondent Through:
Mr.Q.P.Saxena,AdditionalPublic Prosecutorfor the Statewith ACP Ved Prakash,Operation/Outer.
+ CRL.REV.P.186/2012&Crl.M.A.Nos.4228-31/2012 AMRIKSINGH ^ . .
T,, , Petitioner Through:
None.
versus STATE T,, , , Respondent Through:
Mr.Q.P.Saxena,AdditionalPublic Prosecutorfor the StatewithACP CORAMPrakash,Operation/Outer.
HON'BLEMS. JUSTICESUNITAGUPTA
ORDER
11.02.2015 None has appearedfor the petitionersdespitepass over. Even on the last date ofhearing,none had appearedfor the petitioners. It seemsthatpetitionersare notinterestedin pursuingthepetitions. The sameare dismissedin defaultand for non-prosecution. FEBRUARY11,2015 SUNITAGUPTA,J mb By:AMULYA