← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./7063/2024

Istakar Beg @ Bittu v. State Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.

2024-09-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri2 pages

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7063/2024, CRL.M.A. 26975/2024 ISTAKAR BEG @ BITTU .....Petitioner Through:

Petitioner in person.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjiv Sabhrawal, APP for State with W/SI Deepa, P.S. Seelampur.

Respondent No. 2 alogwith her husband.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 06.09.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 210/2024 registered under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC at P.S. Seelampur, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioner hurled abuses and also gave beatings to respondent No.2.

3.

Ld. APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is the only accused person and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case. He, on further instructions, submits that besides the respondent No.2, petitioner has also given beatings to her husband. He further, submits that though the parties have compromised, however, since the State machinery has been put in motion and the allegations were of grave nature, some cost may be imposed upon the petitioner. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:11:27

4.

Petitioner, who is present in Court, submits that petitioner and respondent No. 2 have amicably settled their disputes vide Compromise Deed/Settlement Deed dated 14.08.2024, a copy of which has also been placed on record.

5.

Petitioner and respondent No.2 alongwith her husband, who are present in Court, have been identified by the I.O./W/SI Deepa, P.S. Seelampur, Delhi. Petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct and undertakes not to repeat the same in future.

6.

Respondent No. 2 states that she has entered into the settlement with the petitioner out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.20,000/- to be paid to respondent No.2 by way of a demand draft within two weeks through the Investigating Officer. 9.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. failing which, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move appropriate application. 10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:11:27