Keshav v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation And ANR.

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) No.1610/2018 & CM APPL. No. 6621/2018 KESHAV ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate.

versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for SDMC/R1 with Mr.Sanjay Baniwal, Mr.Shashi Gupta, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 24.01.2019 In view of what is stated in status report dated 18.01.2019 filed by respondent No. 1, namely that action in accordance with law has been initiated in respect of the subject property, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As pointed-out by learned counsel appearing for SDMC and as recorded in order dated 20.02.2018, respondent No. 1/SDMC is also at liberty to take action if any un-authorized construction is found in the petitioner's own property.

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

JANUARY 24, 2019 j