Navamma & ORS. v. The Archaeological Survey Of India Through Directore Of General , Delhi Curcle Humayoun Tomb
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12608/2024, CM APPL. 52413/2024 & CM APPL. 71043/2024 NAVAMMA & ORS.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Dwarka Sawale, Advocate.
versus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTORE OF GENERAL , DELHI CURCLE HUMAYOUN TOMB ,DELHI CIRCLE(SUB CIRCLE HUMAYUN TOMB)_ & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr Vikram Jetly CGSC with Ms Shreya Jetly Advocates for R-1, 5 & 7.
Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms.
Yashita Jain for DUSIB.
Mr. Anubhav Gupta , Panel Counsel ( Civil) GNCTD, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocates for R-4.
Adv. Siddhant Nath, Adv. Bhavishya Makhija, Adv. Amaan Khan , Adv.
Chaitanya Popli FOR Respondent MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 16.04.2026 1.
The petitioner in the instant petition seeks for the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a Mandamus or Direction or appropriate writ to the Respondents to provide the relocation or resettlement to the petitioners, under appropriate scheme and rehabilitation policy of Govt of india, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 13:38:58
(ii) May be restored the their Pucca house of the petitioners on their respective place where other peoples also leaving there with compensation due to illegal demolished by the respondents or., (iii) May be providing the alternative plot and accommoaation to the petitioners.
(iv) And/or pass such other and further order(s) as your Lordships may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 2.
Various submissions have been made and the parity has also been claimed as per the order dated 09.05.2025 in W.P.(C) 8035/2024. 3.
During the course of hearing, it has been brought to the notice of the Court by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-DUSIB that out of seven petitioners, three petitioners have been found to be eligible for rehabilitation. He also submits that the remaining four petitioners are not eligible.
4.
The Court thus finds that the DUSIB to take necessary steps for the rehabilitation of the three petitioners without any further delay. 5.
So far as the ineligible petitioners are concerned, let the petitioners to make a representation along with a copy of this order to the DUSIB, along with all documents. Let the DUSIB to extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their representatives. Thereafter, to pass an appropriate order. Let the DUSIB to do the needful.
6.
If the petitioners, thereafter, are aggrieved, they shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 7.
With these observations, petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 16, 2026/P The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 13:38:58