Munna @ Rikas v. State

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 566/2018 MUNNA @ RIKAS ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Kamna Vohra for Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC with SI Dinesh Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 21.02.2018 Petitioner is seeking parole for the reasons mentioned in the petition. One of such reasons is to file an SLP against the dismissal of his appeal by this Court on 13.10.2017.

Status report has been filed by the State. The address of the petitioner at Patna, Bihar stands verified. The nominal roll of the petitioner has been requisitioned. This reflects that he is a convict under Sections 376 (2)(e)/506 Part II and Section 344 of the IPC. He has been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years. As on date he, including remission, has undergone incarceration of more than 7 years. His jail conduct is satisfactory.

Accordingly, petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks (to be counted from the date of his release) on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety

of like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendant with condition that the petitioner shall surrender himself to the Jail immediately on the expiry of the aforenoted parole period of four weeks. He shall report to the local SHO on every Monday of each week. He shall also furnish his latest mobile number and residential address to the local SHO.

Petition disposed of in the above terms.

A copy of this petition be sent to the Jail Superintendant concerned.

INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY 21, 2018 ndn