Iag Company Ltd. v. Union Of India & ORS

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1792/2016 IAG COMPANY LTD.

..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms.Purti Marwaha, Advocate with Ms.Henna George, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Dr.L.C.Singhi, Advocate for RMr.Keshav Mohan, Advocate with Mr.Piyush Chaudhary, Advocate for R-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 02.05.2016 1.

The writ petition was filed on account of not filling vacancies in BIFR and as a result the Board was not functioning. The problem is over. BIFR is now functioning on account of a notification issued on April 18, 2016. 2.

We dispose of the petition as infructuous but would extend the operation of the interim order dated March 01, 2016 till BIFR decides the application filed by the petitioner in the Registry, which application has been annexed as Annexure-9 to the writ petition. 3.

Since the matter needs an urgent hearing we direct that upon an application filed in the Registry the application (Annexure-9 to the writ W.P.(C) 1792/2016

petition) shall be placed by the Registrar, BIFR before the Board for consideration on a date next week.

4.

No costs.

5.

DASTI.

CM No.7643/2016 Dismissed as infructuous.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 02, 2016 'skb'

W.P.(C) 1792/2016