← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/307/2024

Kaushal And ORS v. State Through Sho Ps Ranhola And ANR

2024-01-30Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma3 pages

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 307/2024 KAUSHAL AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Avijeet Kumar, Ms. Insha & Mr.

Aoun Abbas, Advocates alongwith petitioners in person.

versus STATE THROUGH SHO PS RANHOLA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocate.

ASI Anil Kumar, P.S. Ranhola, Outer District, Delhi.

Mr. Devraj Singh, Advocate alongwith R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 30.01.2024 CRL.M.A. 2812/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(CRL) 307/2024 3.

The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No. 842/2023, under Sections 308/323/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Ranhola. 4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that that petitioners and respondent no. 2 are neighbours and the present FIR was The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

registered on account of a dispute which arose between the parties on the occasion of diwali. It is pointed out that during the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 06.12.2023. In pursuance of which, respondent no. 2 has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. Cross-FIR bearing FIR No. 841/2023, under Sections 308/323/34 of the IPC at P.S. Ranhola, registered at the instance of petitioner no. 1 herein, (subject matter of W.P.(CRL) 47/2024) is being quashed vide separate order of the same date. 5.

Petitioners and complainant/respondent no. 2 are present before the Court and have been duly identified by their respective counsel, as well as the Investigating Officer, ASI Anil Kumar, P.S. Ranhola. 6.

The complainant/respondent No.2 states that the matter has been settled with the petitioners and he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. 7.

Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that investigation in the present FIR is pending and chargesheet is yet to be filed. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State also has no objection if the present FIR is quashed, subject to cost. 8.

In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:- "61. ... In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceeding."

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances, and the fact that the parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 842/2023, under Sections 308/323/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Ranhola.

10.

In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 842/2023, under Sections 308/323/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Ranhola, is hereby quashed, subject to cost of Rs. 25,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners with Delhi High Court Bar Association Employees Welfare Fund within 10 days from today.

11.

Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. 12.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J JANUARY 30, 2024/bsr The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.