Capital First Limited v. Naresh Raj Associates Pvt. Ltd.

$~24 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CO.PET. 250/2016 & CO.APPL. 1053/2016 CAPITAL FIRST LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus NARESH RAJ ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 17.04.2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the second call. It is 4 p.m.

There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner at the first call either. Affidavit of service of notice has not been filed by the petitioner despite opportunity.

The petitioner does not seem to be keen in prosecuting the present petition.

In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed in default. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J APRIL 17, 2017 mk