Rohtash Kumar Goyal v. State NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2655/2025 ROHTASH KUMAR GOYAL .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Jatan Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Bansal, Mr. Prabhat Saini, Ms.
Mansi, Mr.
Ajeet Kumar, Mr. Aayush Jain, Mr. Aayush Jain, Mr. Tushar Sharma and Mr. Mohit Siwas, Advocates with Petitioner in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC with Mr. Dietya Khatri, Advocate for the State alongwith SI Mukul, PS Keshav Puram R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 28.11.2025 1.
Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 0466/20025 dated 05.08.2025 registered under Sections 286/125(a) BNS at P.S. Keshav Puram and all the proceedings arising therefrom in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 20.08.2025. 2.
It is submitted that the Complainant suffered amputation of his left hand while working in the factory.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
3.
The parties are present in person in the Court and have been identified by their Counsel.
4.
The Complainant submits that immediately after the incident, he was given medical help by the Petitioner Employer. His all medical requirements also were taken care of by him.
5.
The compensation of Rs.5 lacs has been given to the Complainant in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 20.08.2025, which the Complainant submits, has already been received by him. In addition, he is continuing in the employment by the Petitioner. Though, now he has been given a desk job. In addition, he is also getting some disability pension from ESIC. 6.
The Petitioner is present in person to assure that he would not terminate the service of the Complainant till the age of his superannuation. 7.
The parties have endorsed the amicable Settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily and they submit that the said Settlement has been arrived at between the parties, without any pressure and coercion and that they shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement. 8.
The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Settlement Deed dated 20.08.2025 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR.
9.
In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.
10.
Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
question.
11.
Accordingly, considering the totality of circumstances and the fact that the parties have settled the matter, 0466/20025 dated 05.08.2025 registered under Sections 286/125(a) BNS at P.S. Keshav Puram and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 12.
The Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 28, 2025 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.