Anita v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$-43/44/46 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 422/2018 TEJPAL Petitioner Through Mr. S.S. Drall, Adv.

versus STATE(NCTOF DELm) Respondent Through Mr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Balram and HC. Ajeet Singh, P.S. Mudka ^ AND + BAIL APPLN. 425/2018 Petitioner Through Mr. S.S. Drall, Adv.

versus STATE(NCTOF DELHI) Respondent Through Mr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Balram and HC. Ajeet Singh, P.S. Mudka AND ^ + BAILAPPLN.428/2018 ANITA Petitioner - Through Mr. S.S. Drall, Adv.

versus STATE(NCTOF DELHI) Respondent Through Mr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Balram and HC. Ajeet Singh, P.S. Mudka

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

ORDER

% 21.02.2018 Complainant has alleged in the FIR that petitioners are related to complainant. Petitioner Tejpal is brother-in-law; whereas Ritu and Anita are sisters-in-law.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a quarrel took place between them on some trivial issues. It is submitted that a cross FIR has already been registered. Complainant had sustained simple injury. As per the FIR itself, petitioners were not armed with any weapon. Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances of this case, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioners be released on bail subject to their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ^10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with one surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO concerned. Petitioners shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and appear before V the Investigating Officer as and when they are called upon to do so. Bail applications are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATOAK, J.

FEBRUARY 21,2018 r.bararia