Mehmood Topiwala v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

49# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 673/2018 MEHMOOD TOPIWALA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Sarthak Maggon, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with SI Alok Bajpai, PS Sp. Cell/SR.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 09.04.2018 Crl. M.A. Nos. 4063/2018 and 4064/2018 (directions) By these applications the petitioner had sought directions to the jail authorities to provide medical record and minutes of the meeting of Sentence Review Board.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the applications. Applications are dismissed as not pressed.

W.P.(CRL) 673/2018 1.

By this petition the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to arrange funds, find suitable match for his daughters, arrange funds for their education, establish social ties and look after his health as he is ailing. 2.

The health status report of the petitioner has been sent by the medical officer, in-charge Central Jail No.2, as per which the petitioner is suffering W.P.(CRL) 673/2018

from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, low backache (lumbar spondylitis) and is under treatment from Tihar Jail Hospital, GTB Hospital. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to annexure-P7 to the present petition wherein the petitioner has been actually complaining of neurocanal stenosis which is a neurological problem and despite the same he has been only provided orthopaedic treatment and not neurological treatment. As per the nominal roll of the petitioner, the petitioner was granted parole in the years 2011, 2013, 2015 and thereafter in the year 2017.

4.

Since the last parole granted to the petitioner was nearly ten months ago, this Court deems it fit to grant parole to the petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioner be release on parole for a period of six weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

5.

Petition is disposed of.

6.

Order dasti.

7.

Copy of the order be also communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

APRIL 09, 2018 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 673/2018