Deepak v. Kajal Upadhyay

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 36/2024 DEEPAK .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus KAJAL UPADHYAY .....Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 27.02.2025 CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 36/2024 & CRL.M.A. 32680/2024, CRL.M.A. 28221/2024 & CRL.M.A. 28222/2024 1.

An application for delay of 455 days has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

It is reported that no affidavit in support of the delay application has been filed.

3.

No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called out. On the last date of hearing also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present matter any further.

5.

Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:48:58

6.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2025/zp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:48:58