← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./6056/2025

Sh Shahbaj Ahmad & ORS. v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2025-08-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia2 pages

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 6056/2025 SH SHAHBAJ AHMAD & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Abhik Kumar and Ms. Nehal Kashyap, Advocates with petitioners.

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with ASI Brijender Singh, PS Sangam Vihar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1.

Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 704/2016 of PS Sangam Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

2.

Respondent no. 2 appearing with her counsel and identified by IO/ASI Brijender Singh accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection to this petition. 3.

I have spoken with parties in Hindi and it is stated by them that CRL.M.C.6056/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6 fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80 cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.29 17:11:53 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA By:NEETU N NAIR 17:37:02

petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2 have compromised all their matrimonial disputes. It is stated by respondent no.2 that towards full and final settlement of all her claims pertaining to her stridhan and alimony etc., she has received complete amount of Rs.6,00,000/- from petitioner no. 1; that marriage between her and petitioner no. 1 stands dissolved by way of decree of divorce and they have no issue born out of the wedlock. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of the petitioners. 4.

Considering the above circumstances and having spoken with the parties, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial.

5.

Therefore, the petition is allowed and the FIR No. 704/2016 of PS Sangam Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/506/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.29 17:11:36 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 29, 2025/ry CRL.M.C.6056/2025 Page 2 of 2 pages By:NEETU N NAIR 17:37:02