Sunita Kumari v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1597/2017 SUNITA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Dharmender Sharma and Ms. Monika Singh, Advocates versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR..... Respondents Through Ms. Reema Khorana, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Mr. Udit Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 07.03.2017 Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is restricting his prayer only to the extent of transfer of tehbazari site which stands in the name of mother of the petitioner to his name. Counsel for the respondent without admitting any of the averments made in the writ petition, submits that should the petitioner makes an application with all supporting documents to the respondent, the same would be considered in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The respondent/TVC will take a decision in accordance with law based on the documents to be placed on record by the petitioner. CM.APPL 7202/2017 also stands disposed of.

G.S.SISTANI, J VINOD GOEL, J MARCH 07, 2017/pst /