Uday Gupta v. Emaar India Limited

$~74 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P. (MISC.) (COMM.) 736/2024 and I.A 39830/2024 UDAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kartik Nagarkatti and Mr.

Varun Ahuja, Advs.

versus EMAAR INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Nausheen, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 19.09.2024 1.

This is a petition under Section 29A (5) read with 29A (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitrator, who was in seisin of the dispute between the parties.

2.

The mandate of the learned Arbitrator is stated to have expired on 11 September 2024.

3.

Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection. 4.

Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator stands extended by six months from 11 September 2024. 1 "the 1996 Act", hereinafter OMP(Misc)(comm) 736/2024 KUMAR 17:25:45 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 17:25:13

5.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/yg Click here to check corrigendum, if any OMP(Misc)(comm) 736/2024 KUMAR 17:25:45 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR 17:25:13