← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P./1159/2024

Sh. Dharmender Hooda & ANR. v. Smt. Inderwati

2024-11-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan2 pages

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P.

1159/2024, CRL.M.A.

28465/2024, CRL.M.A. 28466/2024 & CRL.M.A. 28467/2024 SH. DHARMENDER HOODA & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr.

Rohit Kumar, Advocate (Through V.C.).

versus SMT. INDERWATI .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R

% 13.11.2024 1.

The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 18.03.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, South East District, Saket Courts, Delhi in execution case no.242/2022 titled as 'Inderwati vs. Dharmender Hooda', pursuant to which the warrant of attachment of immoveable goods was passed against the petitioners.

2.

By order dated 13.02.2019, the learned Family Court, noting the prevalent minimum wages in Delhi, granted an ad interim maintenance for a sum of ₹1,500/- per month by each of the petitioners to the respondent. The petitioners are the sons of respondent.

3.

All the relevant details in regard to the proceedings between the parties are not reflected in the present petition. 4.

On being pointedly asked, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the maintenance amount has not been The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 13:03:14

paid due to financial difficulties.

5.

The petitioners have not denied their relationship with the respondent. On being asked, it is stated that the respondent is a senior citizen.

6.

Admittedly, the amount as directed by the learned Trial Court as an interim maintenance has not been paid and thus any order in regard to issuance of warrant of attachment of immoveable goods does not merit an intervention. 7.

Even otherwise, a sum of ₹1,500/- by each of the petitioners is too meagre an amount requiring any interference by this Court. It is unfortunate that the petitioners who are 48 and 40 years of age respectively are not even willing to pay a sum of ₹3,000/- to their mother which has led to filing of an execution petition in which the impugned order has been passed. 8.

The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024 'Aman'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2024 at 13:03:14