Hoya Medical Pvt. Ltd v. Everest Vision

$~40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P. (MISC.) 32/2024 HOYA MEDICAL PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tushar Agarwal, Ms. Roopsee Pandita, Advs.

versus EVEREST VISION .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Divang Ghosh, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 20.09.2024 1.

This is a petition filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 3 months.

2.

The matter is listed for pronouncement of the Award, but due to some personal exigencies of the Arbitrator, the same could not be done. 3.

Issue notice. Mr. Ghosh, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and has no objection to the petition being allowed. 4.

I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown. 5.

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 3 months from today for making and publishing the Arbitral Award.

6.

The period till today stands regularized.

JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 sp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 12:03:03