← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./6114/2025

Anmol Gupta And ANR v. The State Through S.H.O, P.S. Keshav Puram,Delhi And ORS

2025-09-01Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6114/2025 ANMOL GUPTA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through:

Petitioners with their counsel Mr.

Ajay Khatana and Mr. Jitin Kunar, Advs.

Versus

THE STATE THROUGH S.H.O, P.S. KESHAV PURAM,DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State.

R-2 to R-4 with their counsel (appearance not given).

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 01.09.2025 1.

By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 399/2016, registered at Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi for commission of offence punishable under Sections 419/420/469/471/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereafter 'IT Act'). 2.

Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 3.

All the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 to 4 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

(IO) from Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi. 4.

Brief facts of the present case are that on 31.05.2016, on the complaint of respondent no. 2, the present FIR was registered at the concerned Police Station against the petitioners. During pendency of the case, both the parties had amicably settled their disputes vide Settlement Deed/Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 20.08.2025. 5.

On a query made by this Court, respondent nos.2 to 4, who have been identified by the IO, have categorically stated that they have entered into compromise out of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent nos.2 to 4 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between them vide the aforesaid MOU. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 further state they have no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 6.

In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 7.

Accordingly, FIR bearing no. 399/2016, registered at Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi for commission of offence punishable under Sections 419/420/469/471/34 of IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to the costs of Rs.15,000/- each on both the petitioners, to be deposited with Delhi Advocates' Welfare Fund, Rohini Court Bar Association, within seven days from date.

8.

In view of above, the present petition stands disposed of. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 01, 2025/A The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.