Jitender Mohan Sehgal v. Rajinder Pal Sehgal & ORS.

$~A-22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 819/2005 and CM Nos. 16359/2005, 37993/2016, 37994/2016 & 43379/2016 JITENDER MOHAN SEHGAL ..... Appellant Through Mr.Deepak Dewan, Advocate.

versus RAJINDER PAL SEHGAL & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Mr.Vaibhav Asthana, Advocates for LRs of R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 15.12.2016 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has instructions not to press the present appeal.

By the impugned order, the trial court had passed a preliminary decree which was challenged before this court. The trial court is requested to proceed with the matter. Trial court record be sent back. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Interim orders stand vacated.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that she has filed an application under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC before this court. This application would have to be moved before the trial court. All pending applications also stand dismissed. JAYANT NATH, J DECEMBER 15, 2016/rb