Tejpal v. State & ORS

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 622/2016 & CRL.M.A. 3401/2016 TEJPAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr Suraj Rathi, Advocate.

versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms Kamna Vohra, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) for R-1.

Mr Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr Sunil Sehgal, Advocate for R-2.

SI Badri Prasad, PS- Connaught Place, New Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

O R D E R

% 01.03.2016 Ms Kamna Vohra, learned Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondent, on advance notice, states that the representation for parole filed on behalf of the petitioner, which is pending consideration before the competent authority, shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three working days from today under intimation to the petitioner.

Directed accordingly.

With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be given dasti under signature of Court Master to counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MARCH 01, 2016 mk