Hero Investcorp Private Limited & ANR. v. Ashok Kumar Unkown
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 938/2025 & I.A. 21743/2025 HERO INVESTCORP PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through:
Ms. Aastha Sharma and Ms. Jahanvi Sharma, Advocates.
versus MR. MOHD. RAEES .....Defendant Through:
Defendant in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 10.03.2026 1.
This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on his behalf from manufacturing, stocking and offering for sale Seat Cover, Side bag or any other product bearing the marks "HERO", "HUM MEIN HAI HERO", and/or any other mark deceptively and confusingly similar to registered trademarks of the Plaintiffs "HERO" "HUM MEIN HAI HERO"
, amounting to infringement of trademarks, amongst other reliefs. 2.
During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and a Settlement Agreement has been executed on 07.01.2026 incorporating the terms of settlement. Copy of the Settlement Agreement has been placed on record. 3.
Defendant is present in person. He submits that in terms of the CS(COMM) 938/2025 Page 1 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:02:42
settlement, a Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- has been handed over to counsel for the Plaintiffs on 09.03.2026. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs acknowledges this fact and hands over a photocopy of the Demand Draft in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- drawn on IDBI Bank dated 07.03.2026, which is taken on record.
4.
In light of the settlement, counsel for the Plaintiffs submits that the suit be decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendant. 5.
Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties which shall form a part of the decree and terms thereof shall bind the parties thereto. 6.
Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7.
Suit is disposed of along with pending application. 8.
Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870.
9.
By order dated 03.09.2025, Court had appointed a Local Commissioner to seize and take into custody the infringing products. Products were taken into custody but given back to the Defendant on superdari. Defendant who appears in person undertakes that the impugned goods will be destroyed on 23.03.2026 at 2:00 PM in presence of the counsel/representative of the Plaintiffs. Assurance is taken on record. JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 10, 2026/VP CS(COMM) 938/2025 Page 2 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:02:42