Ms Beenu Pal v. Shri Prashanta Kumar Pal

$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2014 MS BEENU PAL ..... Appellant Through :

Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Adv.

versus SHRI PRASHANTA KUMAR PAL ..... Respondent Through :

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 20.01.2016 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant alleges that during the pendency of the present case, the appellant has lost her job on account of the conduct of the respondent and has no source of livelihood. This fact, if true, is subsequent to the passing of the impugned order dated 4th of March 2014 and was never placed before the Family Court.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays to withdraw this appeal with liberty to seek maintenance afresh on all grounds including facts which have arisen subsequent to filing of the application which was decided by the impugned order dated 4th March, 2014.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2014

3.

This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made clear that nothing herein contained is an expression of opinion on the merits of the contentions placed before us. Dasti to the petitioner.

GITA MITTAL, J I.S.MEHTA, J JANUARY 20, 2016 aj MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2014