Union Of India & ORS. v. Priya Associates Through Its Proprietor Mrs Priya Nandwani

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 561/2025, CM APPL. 55539/2025, CM APPL. 55540/2025 & CM APPL. 55541/2025 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Appellant Through:

Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak, Ms.

Shubhra Parashar and Mr. Pushpender Pratap Singh, Advocates versus PRIYA ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MRS PRIYA NANDWANI .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 09.12.2025 1.

Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 08.05.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P(C) 6098/2025 titled "Priya Associates vs. Union of India & Ors.", wherein the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein and granted a 7 months' extension from 16.05.2025 to vacate the stall in question. 2.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the period extended by learned Single Judge is expiring on 17.12.2025. 3.

Keeping in view the admitted position that the extension granted by the learned Single Judge to operate the stall in question is expiring on 17.12.2025, coupled with the fact that the respondent has already furnished its undertaking to vacate the stall in question on its own on expiry of the extended period of 7 months from 16.05.2025, we are of the opinion that no purpose would be The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/12/2025 at 12:56:15

served in keeping the appeal pending. The questions of law, if any, may be considered in any other appropriate matter if and when such a question of law arises.

4.

We may observe that respondent shall vacate the premises in terms of the undertaking given and peacefully handover the vacant physical possession of the stall in question in their occupation. In case the respondent fails to vacate the stall in question within the said period, the appellant will be at liberty to remove the goods from the stall.

5.

Needless to state that the appellant is entitled to issue fresh tender in respect of stalls in question as and when vacated as per the undertaking. The appellant is also at liberty to recover license fee/rent from the respondent if not paid already.

6.

In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of alongwith pending applications, if any.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J DECEMBER 9, 2025/rl The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/12/2025 at 12:56:15