Viren Singh v. Madhup Vyas & ORS

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 138/2018, CM No. 7611/2018 VIREN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shefali Jain, Adv.

versus MADHUP VYAS & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for NDMC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 26.02.2018 CM No. 7611/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 138/2018 The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of order dated November 30, 2017 in W.P. (C) 7821/2017. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that despite the petitioner visiting the office of the respondents and meeting the Officer, no action has been taken so far and no compliance has been done of the direction passed by this Court.

On the other hand, Ms. Puja Kalra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents on the advance notice states, the application of the applicant for

sanction of building plans is under consideration and the decision and communication thereof shall be taken / sent to the petitioner within three weeks/one week from today.

Noting and binding the respondents to the statement made by their counsel, the contempt petition is closed. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by any inaction on the part of the respondents, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this contempt petition.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J FEBRUARY 26, 2018/aky