Vardhman Properties Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

$~27, 28, 29 & 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13512/2025 + W.P.(C) 13514/2025 + W.P.(C) 13552/2025 + W.P.(C) 13563/2025 VARDHMAN PROPERTIES LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Saksham Singhal and Mr. Ram Krishna Rao, Advs.

versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia SSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR % 05.02.2026

O R D E R

1.

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent-Department at the outset submitted that almost entire amount due to the petitioner has been refunded.

2.

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is some computational error in the payment made. 3.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of these petitions while allowing the petitioner to file a representation before the Assessing Officer, who shall consider the same and do the needful in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 13:15:20

accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within the period of three months of receiving the representation. DINESH MEHTA, J.

VINOD KUMAR, J.

FEBRUARY 5, 2026/dd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 13:15:20