Sunny Sareen v. The State Through Secratory NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6315/2025 SUNNY SAREEN .....Petitioner Through:
Ms. Soniya Sharma, Advocate along with petitioner-in-person.
versus THE STATE THROUGH SECRATORY NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for the State.
Respondent no.2-in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 08.09.2025 CRL.M.A. 26694/2025 (exemption) 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6315/2025 3.
By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR bearing no. 806/2015, registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC').
4.
Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5.
The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court in person. They have been identified by their counsels and concerned The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi. 6.
Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 01.12.2014 as per the Hindu rites and customs and were living with each other. No child was born from their wedlock. After some time due, to different lifestyles and temperamental differences, both the parties could not reside with each other and since 20.03.2016, petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no. 2 started living separately from each other. Thereafter, due to temperamental differences between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2, respondent no. 2 got registered the FIR against the petitioners under the relevant sections. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled the present matter vide Compromise Deed dated 18.12.2023, entered between them. 7.
On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been identified by the concerned IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent no. 2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties. Respondent no. 2 further states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 8.
In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9.
Accordingly, FIR bearing no. 806/2015, registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 10.
In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 11.
The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2025/zp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.