← Library
High Court of DelhiITA/148/2024

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Tata Nyk Shipping Pte Ltd

2024-03-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Yashwant Varma,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav2 pages

$~87 & 88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 148/2024, CM APPL. 12825/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv.

versus TATA NYK SHIPPING PTE LTD ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Vohra and Mr.

Hardeep Singh, Advs.

+ ITA 162/2024 & CM APPL. 13774/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Ms. Deeksha Gupta, Adv.

versus TATA NYK SHIPPING PTE LTD.

..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Vohra and Mr.

Hardeep Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

O R D E R

% 18.03.2024 Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing in support of the appeals The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:24:06

fairly concedes that the question of treaty shopping would not arise in the facts and circumstances of the present case and the questions posited would consequently and necessarily answered in light of the decision rendered by the Division Bench of the Court in Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) Vi Fdi Three Pte. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation) [(2023) 452 ITR 111]. The decision in Blackstone speaks of the impermissibility of going behind or questioning the Tax Residency Certificate ["TRC"]. The limited grounds on or circumstances in which a TRC may be questioned or doubted had been lucidly explained by the Supreme Court in UOI & Anr. vs. Azadi Bachao Andolan & Anr. [(2004) 10 SCC 1] and Vodafone International Holidays BV vs. UOI & Anr. [(2012) 6 SCC 613]. In the absence of any factual foundation having been laid in place or alluded to by the appellant and which would qualify the tests laid down in Azadi Bachao and Vodafone International, we are of the considered opinion that no substantial question of law arises.

In view of the aforesaid, the instant two appeals fail and shall stand dismissed.

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.

MARCH 18, 2024/neha The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 00:24:06