Bilal And ORS v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7731/2024 BILAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Hans Raj Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Jai Prakash PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi.

Ms Neelam Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 30.09.2024 1.

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 231/2023 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Subzi Mandi, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

2.

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and the petitioner No.1 (husband) whereas petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are the in-laws of the respondent No.2. 3.

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP for the State, submits that in the present case petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No. 2 is the complainant.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that after ironing out their The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:32:20

differences the parties have settled their disputes and are living together since past one year.

5.

Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in Court and have been identified by their counsels as well as by the IO/ SI Jai Prakash PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi. Respondent No. 2, who is also present in Court, has been identified by the IO/ SI Jai Prakash PS Subzi Mandi, Delhi. Respondent No. 2 states that she has been happily living with her husband i.e., petitioner No.1 since last one year and as of now she has no complaint against her husband. She further states that she is giving this statement out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also states that she has no objection if the present FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed. 6.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

9.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. DASTI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:32:20