Jaidev Sharma v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$21 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 354/2015 JAIDEV SHARMA Petitioner Through: Mr.N.S.Dalal, Advocate with Mr.J.B .Mudgil, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.

Complainant in person with her husband.

SI Seema.

+ BAIL APPLN. 372/2015 Petitioner BRIJESH SHARMA Mr.N.S.Dalal, Advocate with Mr.J.B.Mudgil, Advocate.

Through:

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through:

Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.

Complainant in person with her husband.

SI Seema.

AND + BAIL APPLN. 375/2015 1• BALA DEVI Petitioner Mr.N.S.Dalal, Advocate with Mr.J.B.Mudgil, Advocate.

Through versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP.

Complainant in person with her husband.

SI Seema.

By:AMULYA

/é

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

ORDER

% 28.04.2015 1.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.806/14 under Sections 354/354B/323/506/376/34 IPC PS Najafgarh. Status report has been filed and is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Admittedly, cross case vide FIR No.804/14 under Sections 354/354B/323/509/34 IPC PS Najafgarh has also been registered on the complaint of the petitioner - Bala Devi. Identical allegations against the complainant and her associates have been levelled therein. Both the parties sustained injuries in the quarrel that ensued when the complainant and her husband were filling pots in the street using building material and it was objected to by the petitioners. Subsequently, in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the complainant alleged insertion of finger in her private part which led to adding of Section 376 IPC. Status report reveals that the complainant misused the provisions of law. The petitioners have joined the investigation.

3.

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, they be released on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of 50,000/-, each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer. They shall, however, join the

investigation as and when required and shall not extend any threat to the complainant or her witnesses and abjure violence. 4.

The bail applications stand disposed of GARG, J.

APRIL 28, 2015 / tr