Meenu v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ANR.

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 13766/2025 MEENU .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Vikas Chopra, standing counsel for MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for R-1.

Ms. Nisha Garu, Ms. Annu Poonia, Ms. Priyanka Tomar and Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocates for R-2.

Ms. Sangita Malhotra, SPC, SHO Rani Bagh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 10.02.2026 1.

In compliance with the judgment passed by this Court on 16th October, 2025, a compliance report has been filed on behalf of the SHO, Rani Bagh.

2.

It has been stated in the compliance report that no cognizable offence is found to be made out against the petitioner. 3.

Counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that the compliance report filed on behalf of the SHO, Rani Bagh does not deal with the aspect of the fake Aadhar Card used by the petitioner to file the present petition. The report is also silent on the aspect whether the petitioner was acting in W.P.(C) 13766/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 11:23:29

collusion or at behest of other persons.

4.

The Police shall further investigate the matter and file a further compliance report dealing specially with the aforesaid aspects. 5.

List on 13th May, 2026.

AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 10, 2026 Rzu W.P.(C) 13766/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 11:23:29