Raja Deepak Madan v. New Delhi Municipal Council And ORS

$~62 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 14043/2025, CM APPL.

57501/2025 & CM APPL.

57502/2025 RAJA DEEPAK MADAN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv.

Mob: 9810209570 Email: vineetbhagat@gmail.com versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Zubeda Begum and Mr. Z. Singh, Advs. for R-1/NDMC Mob: 9868119078 Email: zubedabegumadv@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

O R D E R

% 11.09.2025 W.P.(C) 14043/2025 1.

The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking directions to the respondent no. 1, i.e., New Delhi Municipal Corporation ("NDMC"), to forthwith decide the petitioner's pending applications for grant of sanction of additional Floor Area Ratio ("FAR") in respect of the property bearing plot no. 159, 10 Bhagwan Dass Road, New Delhi (White House Apartments), in accordance with the applicable law, rules and policies. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that despite the representations of the petitioner with regard to grant of sanction for additional FAR, the said representations of the petitioner have not been The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

considered, and no finding with regard thereto, has been given by the NDMC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner shall be satisfied if the representation of the petitioner can be considered in this regard.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1-NDMC submits that considering the fact that the representations submitted by the petitioner are old, the petitioner may be directed to file a fresh representation, which shall be decided by the NDMC.

5.

Having heard learned counsels for the parties, and considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that his representation with regard to grant of sanction of additional FAR in respect to the property in question, be decided, it is directed that the present petition be treated as a representation to the respondent-NDMC. 6.

The respondent-NDMC is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months, from today.

7.

At the time of considering the representation of the petitioner, the petitioner through himself or his authorized representative, shall be granted an opportunity of personal hearing.

8.

The petitioner shall also be at liberty to file any documents as may be required, at the time of hearing of the representation of the petitioner. 9.

The decision in the representation of the petitioner shall be duly communicated to the petitioner. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondent no. 1-NDMC, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek his remedies, in accordance with law. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

10.

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition, along with the pending applications, is disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 11, 2025/SK The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.