Hc Rajesh Kumar v. UOI & Nar

$~R-70 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11373/2006 HC RAJESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, Advocate for Mr.A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Shruti Banerjee, Advocate for Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 12.02.2016 1.

Learned proxy counsel appearing for Mr. A.K. Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous during the pendency of the petition for the reason that the Standing Order No.24/2001, issued by the respondent-CRPF, has been implemented in petitioner's case. 2.

In view of the said submission, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed and infructuous.

HIMA KOHLI, J SUNIL GAUR, J FEBRUARY 12, 2016 s