Vijay v. State Of NCT

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2924/2023 VIJAY .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus STATE OF NCT .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC with Mr.

Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates.

SI Parag Rohilla and ASI Devender Kumar, P.S. Sunlight Colony.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R

% 14.08.2025 1.

There has been no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner on the last two occasions. The same position continues today. Nonetheless, the Court has perused the record with the assistance of counsel for the State. 2.

The Petitioner is the Complainant in FIR No. 226/2023, P.S. Sunlight Colony, which was registered under Sections 323/341/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.1 On completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed on 3rd May, 2024 under Sections 323/325/341/506 and 34 of IPC. 3.

The Petitioner, aggrieved by the omission of Section 307 IPC in the chargesheet filed by the Prosecution, filed the present petition seeking the following reliefs:

"1.

Issue in nature of writ in nature of mandamus, to direct 1 "IPC"

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:49:19

respondent to add particularly section 307 of IPC In the either In the FIR or in chargesheet against the accused persons 2.

Direct the respondent to proceeds the Investigation of present case as per law.

3.

Pass any further order/orders or direction/directions as may deem fit and proper."

4.

During the pendency of the present matter, the proceedings before the Trial Court continued, and by order dated 25th March, 2025, charges were also framed under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506, and 34 of the IPC. 5.

In light of the above, in the opinion of the Court, the reliefs sought in the present petition are now rendered infructuous. 6.

In case the Petitioner is aggrieved by the order framing charges, he shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies, in accordance with law.

7.

The Court has not commented on the merits of the case. 8.

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. SANJEEV NARULA, J AUGUST 14, 2025 as The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:49:19